Author’s Note: This excerpt is from my weekly “Top of Mind” email, sent to subscribers every Thursday. For more content like this and to receive the full newsletter each week, sign up on Minding the Campus’s homepage. Simply go to the right side of the page, look for “SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER, ‘TOP OF MIND,’” and enter your name and email.
The old order of higher education is unraveling before our eyes. Demographic shifts, workforce demands, mounting skepticism about the value of a college degree, and the effects of overturning affirmative action are exposing cracks in academia’s once-unshakable foundation, and institutions that cling to outdated practices risk being left behind.
National Association of Scholars president Peter Wood observes that the looming demographic cliff is forcing academia to reckon with decades of uncritical expansion and misplaced priorities. As the student pool shrinks, the myth of college as the only path to success crumbles. K-12 schools, long overdue for reform, will face mounting pressure to improve preparation while underperforming colleges confront their irrelevance.
This shift opens doors to apprenticeships and certifications, which benefit students and employers alike. Employers increasingly doubt the abilities of college graduates, and a survey by Intelligent.com lays it bare: 60 percent of employers fired 2024 grads within months for poor motivation, lack of initiative, and inadequate skills.
[RELATED: We Need McMahon to Tombstone Piledrive the ED]
(I’ve long noted education’s disconnection from the workforce. Despite 90 percent of higher-ed professionals claiming to produce job-ready grads, surveys show widespread dissatisfaction. As of August 2023, less than half of recent graduates believe their degrees signal the right skills to employers. Only 14 percent of students are satisfied with career center support. Employers cite deficits in communication, problem-solving, and critical thinking, with just 11 percent of business leaders confident in graduates’ readiness.)
So employers are increasingly bypassing college graduates in favor of those undergoing vocational training, mirroring trends in states such as Maryland, Utah, and Pennsylvania, which eliminated degree requirements for many jobs in recent years.
This sentiment among employers—and would-be students—is matched with legislative efforts seeking to double down on addressing workforce needs.
In Congress, new House Committee on Education and the Workforce Chair, Tim Walberg, is poised to prioritize workforce readiness, including expanding apprenticeships and extending Pell Grants to short-term training programs. (He and his predecessor, Virginia Foxx, also promise to focus on college affordability as well as aim to combat rising anti-Semitism on college and university campuses).
Some academic institutions, like Wright State University, are jumping on the bandwagon, evaluating its academic courses and programs to test for workforce alignment. While I don’t believe four-year institutions should become workforce training centers—higher education should cultivate intellectual freedom, truth-seeking, and virtuous citizenship—aligning education with workforce needs is, at the very least, pragmatic, if not overdue.
Predictably, so-called elite institutions remain blind to their shortcomings, doubling down on social justice commitments to boost enrollment.
The University of Pennsylvania, MIT, and Carnegie Mellon have raised income thresholds for free or discounted tuition to $200,000. These efforts, framed as altruistic responses to the FAFSA debacle and the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling, are anything but selfless.
As Peter Wood argues in his latest piece, universities prioritize the appearance of public service over genuine efforts to aid underprivileged students. Asking full-paying families to subsidize others raises fairness concerns, and many low-income students might benefit more from alternative career paths.
[RELATED: Academia Must Choose the Path That Leads to Reform]
A more cynical take?
The Supreme Court’s ruling against the use of affirmative action in admissions is accelerating the race to zero tuition. Unable to lower standards for minorities, Harvard Law School saw black enrollment drop to 19 first-year students this fall—the lowest since the 1960s.
The media predictably blames racism, claiming the ruling has a chilling effect on applications. But other elite law schools saw less dramatic declines, and black enrollment across all accredited law schools has increased “from 2,969 to 3,060.”
The old order is collapsing, and higher education must adapt.
As employers shift their focus away from degrees and toward skills, students and families are reevaluating the promise of a college diploma. Lawmakers are demanding affordability and accountability, and demographic realities are forcing universities to confront decades of complacency. Whether academia can rise to the occasion or cling to its crumbling foundations remains to be seen. What’s certain is this: the status quo is no longer an option.
Image by Seika — Adobe Stock — Asset ID#: 977301042 & Edited by Jared Gould
“K-12 schools, long overdue for reform, will face mounting pressure to improve preparation”
Why? WHO is going to push this and HOW?!?
Massachusetts reformed K-12 three decades ago, a “grand bargain” which doubled teachers pay but imposed a lot of accountability and reforms. And I have watched the Massachusetts Teacher’s Association spend the past 25 years chisel away at every bit of what they agreed to while demanding even more money. Even though it has been illegal for public employees in Massachusetts to strike ever since then-Governor Coolidge fired the entire Boston Police Department for being on strike, about eight different districts have gone out on strike this year alone — and every one of them got the raises they wanted.
No one is going to stand up to them — the parents won’t because they are afraid that their children will be retaliated against (and they will be), the teachers vote in a block, and no one will stand up to them.
Worse, they have gone to heterogeneous grouping — putting students of all abilities together — and then teaching to the bottom, because it is easier. And then there are the gangs allowed to run loose in the schools and the behavioral SPED students allowed to run wild because they are, and the sexually confused with delusions that we must affirm and the half dozen (or more) languages spoken by students who know no English.
The teachers lie about how good the schools are, and as no one else is in them, no one knows otherwise.
Nothing is going to change this — not when the union is allowed to set policy.