College sports is on the verge of a profound transformation. Discussions surrounding the creation of a “super league” have been gaining momentum, fueled by the rapid expansion of power conferences like the Big Ten and SEC. But what exactly is a super league, and how could it redefine college athletics—and, more importantly, higher education?
For college sports, a super league represents the consolidation of elite programs into a single, ultra-competitive league. Imagine a scenario where the four major conferences, Big Ten, SEC, ACC, and Big 12, join forces to create a mega-league that dominates the college athletics landscape. Such a league would likely operate outside the traditional NCAA structure, driven by private equity and media revenue, leaving smaller conferences and schools struggling to compete.
The concept gained traction when a private equity firm pitched it to more than 25 athletic directors from power conferences. The proposal included a controversial plan to eliminate games against Group of Five and FCS opponents and focus instead on marquee matchups between power conference teams.
[RELATED: 2024’s Top College Sports Scandals]
The appeal is undeniable for top programs. Consolidation into a super league would generate unprecedented revenue from media rights deals and sponsorships, offering high-profile matchups every week and engaging national audiences. This would significantly depart from the traditional NCAA model, where conferences are more regionally based and emphasize historic rivalries and competitive balance. Super leagues, in contrast, prioritize financial gain and media exposure over regional identity, creating a stark divide between schools included in the elite tier and those left behind.
This shift is only part of a growing trend in college sports: the prioritization of revenue generation at the expense of traditional values like student-athlete welfare and regional rivalries.
In recent years, conference realignment has already strained these traditions, with schools like the University of California, Los Angeles, and the University of Southern California joining the Big Ten despite the logistical challenges of cross-country travel. A super league would amplify these issues, reducing college sports to a spectacle for national audiences while sidelining the athletes, fans, and schools that make the sport unique.
If super leagues were to expand further, the NCAA could face an existential crisis. There’s growing speculation about the possibility of an elite national league operating independently of the NCAA, potentially leading to a tiered system similar to European football (aka soccer).
In such a system, schools could be promoted or relegated based on performance, creating an even greater disparity between elite programs and their counterparts. For universities struggling to balance athletics and academics, this shift could exacerbate the divide between schools focused on athletic success and those prioritizing academic achievement.
The ripple effects of such a transformation would be deeply felt across higher education. Universities heavily reliant on athletics to fund other programs may be financially vulnerable if excluded from a super league. Athletic revenue often supports academic scholarships, infrastructure projects, and student services, meaning smaller schools could face severe budget shortfalls. This financial strain might force universities to cut non-revenue sports, diminish support for academic initiatives, or even raise tuition to offset the loss—directly impacting the accessibility and affordability of higher education for students.
[RELATED: Out of Bounds: Sexual Misconduct Allegations Rock UF Basketball]
Moreover, a super league model could de-emphasize the role of academics in favor of sports, fundamentally altering the mission of higher education—at least for the students involved in college athletics. Schools included in a super league would face immense pressure to prioritize athletics, further professionalizing college sports and shifting resources away from academic pursuits.
While the concept of super leagues is exciting for fans craving marquee matchups and intense competition, the potential consequences for the broader ecosystem of college sports and higher education cannot be ignored. Revenue and national viewership may dominate the conversation, but the heart of college athletics lies in its traditions and the opportunities it provides for athletes and institutions.
As the discussions of this league continue, stakeholders must weigh the short-term financial benefits of super leagues against the long-term effect on not just college sports, but the academic and economic health of higher education itself.
Follow Jessi Wynn on X.
Image by .shock — Adobe Stock — Asset ID#: 194915918
“Athletic revenue often supports academic scholarships, infrastructure projects, and student services,”
Bullbleep.
The academic scholarships usually are for athletes, the infrastructure projects usually benefit the athletic department, and the net student services effort winds up being a subsidy of the athletic department.
Yes a winning team helps with recruitment, but does it really bring in the type of students you want? And yes alumni donate to the teams, but how many of those alumni would donate anyway?
Take, for example, UMass Amherst which decided to upgrade its Football Team (and possibly entire athletic program). It has cost a bleepload of money and in the past 12 years they have been:
1-11
1-11
3-9
3-9
2-10
2-10
4-8
1-11
0-4 (2020)
1-11
1-11
3-9
2-8 (this year so far)
They’ve fired four coaches, all of whom had to be bought out of their contracts at multi-million dollar costs, and it’s become a major rat hole that the university is dumping money down.
Yes half the teams will win — simple statistics — but how much can they continue to shift costs to athletics in an environment where education has become a buyer’s market and parents are increasingly asking what they are getting for their tuition/fee dollars.
And the true wild card is Congress — if a few Universities have a multi-million dollar revenue stream from athletics, perhaps it is time to cut off the Federal subsidies to that universities so that others can get more. This would be a great cause for a politician from a state that doesn’t have one of the dozen or so universities that will win under this plan.
The solution is to tell the NBA, NFL, and NHL to form their own farm teams….