Some Students Aren’t Moving Back Home

As delayed financial independence becomes the norm for young college graduates, a 22-year-old Texas welder shows there’s still another way.

Maverick Garza has been living on his own since he was 19 years old. 

His story, if not unusual, is at least not widely discussed. But his story deserves more attention because, unlike many recent four-year college graduates, Garza achieved financial independence immediately after leaving school. 

A 2025 Sallie Mae survey found that nearly half of Americans who had graduated from college within the previous five years were still living with parents or other relatives. Which majors are most likely to move back home is less clear, though one 2015 analysis found that roughly 15 to 16 percent of humanities and history graduates still lived with their parents at age 29. Major aside, more college graduates are living with their parents as high housing costs and student loan debt put financial independence out of reach. As I argued last week, these financial woes are also fueling political frustration among many highly educated young adults. 

But Garza never had to move back in with his parents. 

Today, at 22, he works as a rig welder in the Houston area. Depending on overtime and per diem, he says he can surpass six figures and has been earning nearly that much since age 20. He has no student debt and tells me that he has recently formed his own LLC for side work building fences and gates. He also hopes to become a Certified Welding Inspector soon, a credential that, he says, carries substantially higher pay. 

His decision to pursue the trades was not born out of hostility toward higher education. He initially enrolled in a business program, but after a few classes, he concluded that earning a business degree was unnecessary to accomplish what he wanted. 

“I realized you don’t need a degree to own a business,” Garza said. “I decided to work with my hands because you can start your own business based off your skill level and how well you perform.” 

Although his parents wanted him to pursue a four-year degree, Garza instead enrolled at South Texas College, a public community college in the Rio Grande Valley, where he earned an Associate of Applied Science in Welding. According to the school’s tuition calculator, the 60-credit program costs about $9,840 for in-district students and $10,440 for Texas residents—a fraction of what many students pay for a bachelor’s degree. 

In an era of declining public trust in higher education, community colleges have largely escaped the reputational decline afflicting many four-year institutions. Peter Wood and I noted in February that while four-year institutions have preoccupied themselves with activism, community colleges have remained focused on workforce preparation and serving students priced out of traditional four-year institutions. This has made community colleges a hot commodity. 

For Garza, community college just made sense. “I chose a two-year degree with certifications,” he said. “I came out with no debt, already finding a job because the trades are needed.” 

Still, he is notably restrained when discussing higher education. Rather than steering young people away from a four-year degree, Garza encourages them to consider all their options before assuming it’s the only path. 

Not everyone encouraged Garza to make up his own mind the way he now encourages others to do. When he first entered the trades, many people questioned his decision. “They’d ask, ‘Why would you go into that? You’re not going to have a big degree under your name,’” he recalled.

Those questions are often asked by people who measure the value of work by the credentials attached to it. As Gary Frankel, editor of the James G. Martin Center, recently quipped, some people think the “lawn guy must have a doctorate to be worthy of acknowledgment.” 

Garza, however, believes attitudes are changing. “I’ve seen people with four-year degrees completely say, ‘I don’t like it,’ and they go to the trades,” he said. “You get your certifications, build your skill level up, and you’re already making more than someone with a four-year degree at a starter job.” 

Prestige, either way, doesn’t seem to interest Garza much. What he talks about is craftsmanship: “I’ve always said take pride in your work. When you take pride in your work, people will see it.” 

After all, welding isn’t for the dumb or faint of heart—”You’re lifting stuff daily. You’re getting your body moving. You’re getting over 10,000 steps. You’re sweating,” he said—and Garza doesn’t describe that as settling for less. 

“Don’t be afraid to go in the opposite direction,” he said. “Don’t listen to the outside noise.” 

Garza’s story doesn’t prove that everyone should become a welder. But at a time when so many graduates of traditional four-year colleges are struggling to achieve financial independence, it does suggest that other paths to a successful life deserve more serious consideration. 

Follow Jared Gould on X. 

  1. I think there’s something that needs to be said here — the baby boomers, beneficiaries of post war prosperity and changing social norms, were the first generation to not come home to live with their parents until they got married.

    A century ago, this was the norm. At least one of the children would move home to help take care of the parents and then inherit the house when they died. Or they would build a house for the young couple from the same parcel of land that the parents lived on.

    Such was common, and quite necessary in the days before Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society Welfare State. Often the sons joined the family business, be it farming, fishing, retail or construction.

    Part of the reason why we have a housing shortage today is that a lot of single adults living alone where they would’ve been in intergenerational living units in decades past. What I’m saying is that we should not consider the baby boomers to be have been normal — I argue that they instead were a unique generation that was uniquely privileged in a way that no group of young people had been before nor ever will be again.

    While I’m not defending institutions that can’t produce knowledgeable graduates, I think we’re making a mistake separating young adults from the older generation. As a society, I don’t think we can afford it, as you look at the social problems we’ve had since the 1960s, I’m not so sure it’s a good idea socially.

    As to welding, this was before your time Jared, but it was the classic example of someone using a trade to finance her pursuit of her dreams.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILWSp0m9G2U&list=RDILWSp0m9G2U&start_radio=1

    The days of the college degree guaranteeing post graduation employment are long gone, I think everybody attending college should have a trade to fall back on, and if we could somehow get it around the Duke Power decision, it was necessary to be falling back on the tree because a lot of people won’t bother to go to college. Why should they?

    1. I agree. My article does assume that financial independence and moving out on one’s own are worthwhile goals, but I don’t necessarily think they are the highest social ideals. Historically, multigenerational living was common, and there are strong arguments that we’ve lost something valuable by treating complete independence as the default marker of adulthood.

      My point is simply that if our culture continues to reward financial independence and, rightly or wrongly, stigmatize young adults who live with their parents, there are still ways to avoid that stigma. It is still possible to become financially independent at a relatively young age—but perhaps not by following the conventional four-year college path we’ve spent decades telling young people is the only route out of their childhood home.

      So I don’t disagree that the Baby Boomers were a historical exception. But their expectations continue to shape our culture. As long as independence remains one of the benchmarks by which young adults are judged, it’s worth pointing out that there are still viable paths to achieving it.

  2. Well, where I live, during the Great Recession, the local CC’s took in a large number of students, who then had a very low success record — so much that the closest CC very nearly went out of business. And the local welder pay is not so hot to this day.

    I am somewhat familiar with people in trades — my father was an electrician, my mother a nurse’s aid, one of my uncles a welder. Another uncle had a hard scrabble business that became pretty successful. All of these people wanted very badly for their children to go to a four year college — the more prestigious, the better.

    Maybe they weren’t always right in their attitudes. But I am kind of suspicious of people with four year degrees trying to steer people into the trades. Maybe not if they are a garden variety public four year, especially if they thought it was not worth it. But especially people who get a fancy degree, and then get a doctoral level degree, or a fancy master’s. And especially if they then go on to law school or Harvard or Yale or Stanford. I see such people wearing their PHONY letter. Is that just my imagination?

    1. BullBleep.

      NAME the community college that “nearly went out of business” because it’s graduates did not enjoy employment success — or even one where there was an identified the link between graduation and employment.

      A community college might, MAYBE, run into trouble if it had an abysmally low graduation rate, but even then, as long as the community college still had enrollment — absent atrociously incompetent management — it should be OK. Corinthian colleges were a different story, but then I’m not sure how much they were sandbagged by ED.

      It’s the four year colleges that are closing, every community college I’m aware of has doing quite well, so which one didn’t.

      Beyond that, it is downright fraudulent to tell young people in their parents that a four year degree is a ticket to economic and social success. What’s even more offensive is to falsely claim credit for those graduates who are successful without accepting liability for those who are not.

      Oil rig welding is a specialized trade, and I don’t know if you noticed mention of the fact that this young man has a 60 credit degree. The annual salary for a rig welder in the United States typically ranges from $70,665 to $94,407, so with overtime and per diem bonuses for being stuck out on a oil rig 24 hours a day, he probably is making six figures a year.

      As opposed to maybe $11,300 a year at a Houston-area Starbucks….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Donate Today

Will you help us continue our work to reform American higher education?