Why Are Students Paying Thousands to Live in Mold?

Students are paying premium prices for campus housing that is too often unfit to justify the cost.

The fantasy of dorm living ends after roughly a week, usually around the first encounter with the communal bathroom and the mold. At four-year institutions, the average cost of living in a dorm is nearly $13,000 per year. For a shared room that may or may not have air conditioning—and probably has mold—that price is steep.

My own experience has been tolerable—the communal bathrooms and the morning I woke up to a flooded room notwithstanding—but I know students at my university, Emory, who have had it bad.

While writing for the Emory Wheel, my school’s independent, student-run newspaper, I reported on persistent problems in the Jolley Residential Center (JRC), widely regarded as one of the campus’s worst residence halls. Students I interviewed described bathrooms in constant disrepair, citing broken toilets, oppressive humidity, and, in the most serious cases, mold so severe that some had to relocate. At the time of my reporting, rumors circulated that the university was planning to renovate JRC. But the latest reporting indicates plans to construct an entirely new building—a project that seems to be delayed.

Unfortunately, this kind of situation is common on American campuses.

Howard University drew attention in 2021 when students slept outdoors in encampments to protest unlivable conditions—mold, insect infestations, leaky ceilings, and flooding—that they said put their health at risk.

One freshman told ABC News that she suspected mold in her dorm had contributed to a respiratory infection. She said she simply wanted housing that did not threaten her health, but instead found herself, as she described it, “waking up every morning with a cough that I didn’t go to sleep with the night before, and struggling to breathe at night.”

Online discussion forms suggest the housing problems go beyond maintenance.

In a Reddit thread from last year, one user wrote that her niece had nowhere to stay after transferring to Howard. “When we applied we were told that freshmen and sophomores would be on campus but as it stands now she doesn’t even have an assignment,” she said. Another commenter replied that the situation was widespread: “Unfortunately I know so many in this situation this year. They over-admitted freshmen and all of the housing has been in disarray it’s horrible.”

Howard’s freshmen and sophomores are required to live in university housing—housing that costs more than $12,000 per year.

The university has taken steps to address the issue, including plans to renovate residence halls and expand housing capacity. Yet the lack of space remains a persistent problem, and in recent years, some students have even been placed in temporary accommodations such as hotels while the university works to expand campus housing.

And Howard is hardly an isolated case.

In the same year as the protests at Howard, the University of California, Santa Barbara faced criticism for its proposed Munger Hall—a mega-dorm designed with mostly windowless rooms intended to “force students out of their sleeping cubbies and into communal spaces.” The project was ultimately canceled after architects and students likened it to a “psychological experiment.” The New Yorker weighed in on the situation and documented the already windowless Munger dorm at the University of Michigan, where students reported errant fire alarms, a trash chute that bombarded residents with falling waste, and the profound discovery that removing windows does not, in fact, make people make friends.

More recently, bats infested the University of Georgia’s Oglethorpe House—a dorm that costs students roughly $3,000 per semester—prompting a health investigation into possible rabies exposure. Students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill also reported mold outbreaks in 2019 severe enough to force temporary relocations while the buildings were cleaned. And reports from as recent as January of this year suggest that significant issues persist.

It’s clear that inadequate dorm conditions are not confined to a handful of campuses. They are widespread across higher education.

Why do these problems keep happening?

One reason is simply that many residence halls are outdated. Built decades ago, their plumbing, ventilation, and structural systems have steadily deteriorated, making them especially prone to serious maintenance problems. Universities also frequently defer maintenance because housing competes with other “budget priorities” such as athletics. (Read, “College Sports Have Outgrown the Schools That Made Them.”) Overenrollment has also led to overcrowding, prompting the conversion of study lounges and other common spaces into dorm rooms. I spent my first year of college in a converted study room due to overenrollment. It wasn’t terrible, but it definitely was not designed for three students.

Of course, dorms are revenue generators. Universities charge thousands of dollars each year for shared rooms, while conditions sometimes, if not often, resemble low-quality rentals. Since many students—especially freshmen—are required to live on campus, they have little choice but to pay premium prices for substandard housing.

But I think if colleges and universities are going to charge exorbitant amounts of money for dorm living, the quality of these units should match the price.

  1. In one sentence, the problem is that institutions consider students to be an inexhaustible fungible resource to be exploited for the benefit of the institution.

    Fungible is a business law term that means interchangeable— if I borrow $20 from you, I am not going to give you the same physical bill back, I’ve already spent it. Instead, I’m going to give you *a* $20 bill, as they are all the same.

    It’s all about greed. Their cost are essentially fixed, it won’t cost them much more to jam more students in, but they’ll make a whole lot more money if they do. In some cases, making this money is necessary to pay the bills — but that’s result of choosing to have bills that high. For example, Harvard has 2,600 more administrators than undergraduates!

    And their attitude is really quite simple — if you don’t like it, you can leave and they’ll replace you with somebody else. This attitude may change next fall when the children not born in 2008 won’t show up on campus, but right now, this is the case and it has been this way for at least 30 years now.

    It’s all about greed — while ideally you only have something like 90% occupancy so that you have some flexibility when you need to move people for whatever reason, you will make more money at 100% and even more at 110%, even if you do have people living in closets.

    And the college gets away with doing something that would never be tolerated of a slumlord — where state law often allows you to withhold rent until a landlord fixes things, not only just a college get the money in advance, they can simply kick you out of school if you don’t pay. This is an end run around the laws that are supposed to address hability issues.

    In terms of suing, colleges know that 80% – 90% of the students with a legitimate lawsuit will never be able to find or afford an attorney, and of those who do it’s usually nothing more than a nasty letter from the attorney. Of the one or two lawsuits that actually get filed, they will offer a cash settlement and a nondisclosure agreement, knowing that the attorney will force the student to accept it, and then the nondisclosure agreement prevents anyone else from learning that the student actually got money.

    So they don’t care — their attitude is “sucks to be you.” I will never forget when UMass Amherst left a decomposing body in a dorm room for a week, in August, in a building without air-conditioning. They don’t care…

    There is the larger issue of maintenance, and it’s not just deferred maintenance. The baby boomers arrived in higher education 1965-75 and a lot of dormitories were built at that time. But the problem is that they were built with a 30–40 year life expectancy and the presumption that someone would be tearing them down around the year 2000 because they were then tearing down WPA buildings which had been built 30 to 40 years earlier. (And the WPA buildings that weren’t torn down are in better shape today than what they replaced them with.)

    The Arab oil embargo occurred in 1973, the price of oil tripled inside of a month or so. During the 1970s there was an effort to make buildings airtight to save on heat and, in the south, air conditioning. The only problem is that each human being puts about 7 pounds of water vapor into the air every day, mostly from showering. If you don’t physically remove that water from the building, water will start accumulating and you get mold.

    It also doesn’t help that we removed mercury and lead from our paint — these metals are also poisonous to mold. And if you really want a good scare, look up what Aspergillis is, although most black mold is actually something else. Rabies from bats — I have to admit I have not come across that one before. Wow…

    The other thing that’s relevant here is that a lot of institutions built stuff in the ‘00s when the millennial bubble arrived, and they did it on bonds they floated for 20 to 30 years with a presumption that they would be able to steal from someplace else. Some places may be able to do that, but not everyone.

    What I’m saying is that the finances of a lot of institutions are far more shaky than a lot of people realize. The other thing that gets interesting is that some bonds are underwritten with a promise that there will be a certain number of students using the building and the institutions building to collect fees from them, and hence the revenue stream to service the bond. What this means is that they can’t close the building without defaulting on the bond.

    But the bottom line is that the days of colleges and universities viewing students as future alumni donors are long over. They see students as a fungible resource to fund the largess, and nothing more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *