A Cancelled Professor Wrote a Thriller

After being driven out of academia, Scott Gerber turned his legal insight into a thriller drawn from the darkest corners of modern crime.

The Trafficker by Scott Gerber is the tale of a 14-year-old girl kidnapped by a Canadian criminal who runs a brothel in Toronto, which caters to rich men who favor very young girls. The trafficker uses isolation, drugs, and violence to keep his stable in line, and murder when necessary. 

If the name Scott Gerber rings a bell, it is because he was featured in dozens of news stories a few years ago when he was fired from his position as a law professor at Ohio Northern University (ONU). The National Association of Scholars (NAS) stood by him. I wrote more than half a dozen articles about his case, which was among the egregious “cancellations” in our era of widespread academic thuggery. Gerber’s dismissal stemmed from his decision to call out his university’s violations of civil rights laws regarding racial preferences. He sued for wrongful termination and, with the help of attorneys from America First Legal, won his case.

I got tangled up in the case, too, when the university’s attorneys deposed me. It was an odd affair. I was asked over and over again in the course of a long day whether I had been in the room when Gerber was fired. The answer was no. I’ve never been in any room with Gerber, least of all a room at ONU. When the ordeal was over, I asked my own attorney what this strange interrogation was all about. He inferred that the university was laying the groundwork to sue me for libel for writing about Gerber’s cases in a manner that was unflattering to the university president. If they sued, he assured me, I would win, but it would cost me a great deal of time and money. He also advised me to stop writing about the case. If I stopped, he was confident the university would leave me alone.

I stopped. But Gerber and I remained in touch, and my education in the lowdown ways of college administrators and mercenary attorneys continued. In the final settlement of the case, Gerber signed a non-disclosure agreement, which means that he cannot speak to the details. And because Gerber is a scrupulous man, he has disclosed none of those details to me. But this much I know: a highly regarded and well-published scholar and award-winning teacher was ousted from his tenured position for advocating views within his sphere of professional expertise. And in the train of events that followed, though he won his legal case, he lost his career. 

Ohio, as it happens, was in the midst of a state-mandated education reform that included the creation of “civic centers” at five of its state universities. Gerber, who is amply qualified to teach at any of them and who applied for positions at them, was never even called for an interview. As time went by, he applied for similar positions around the country with the same results.

I can explain this in two ways. 

First, he had made it clear in his fight with ONU that he can be a combative character. The heads of those centers presumably intend to lie low and show their host universities that they can be relied on not to stir up trouble. Second, Gerber is a man of principle who does not fit easily—or perhaps at all—into the shadowy world of contemporary higher education where subterfuge, duplicity, and knavery are commonplace. Protecting the “diversity, equity, and inclusion” establishment for the duration of the Trump presidency is the order of the day, no matter how much deception it entails. No one wants a proven whistleblower, especially one with a sophisticated knowledge of the law. 

In any event, Gerber found himself with time on his hands, and having written four other published novels, he set himself the task of writing another. The Trafficker is the result.

Gerber is ingenious and creative. Turning to what he learned while serving on the Ohio Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, he wrote The Trafficker, which details the world that spawns men like Jeffrey Epstein. The police have picked up a young girl soliciting sex at a truck stop. Because she will not give her name, the court calls her Jane Doe and remands her to the custody of a law professor who has previous experience attempting to bring these damaged children back to something resembling a normal human life. But Jane Doe flees at the first opportunity. She is certain that the trafficker will track her down.

And she is right. The trafficker outwits the police and takes her back to his brothel. This is a tightly wrought, suspenseful novel that I cannot summarize without spoiling the plot. What I can say is that Gerber has adroitly woven into the story a realistic exposition of how the trafficking of children works: how the traffickers groom and control their victims psychologically; how they evade the law; and how this racket is sustained by the wealthy and privileged men it gratifies. The average life expectancy of a girl, once she is trafficked, is seven years. One thing we can say on Epstein’s behalf is that he sent most of his girls to college rather than to shallow graves on Little Saint James. 

Gerber has stuck to the principle of writing about what he knows. Much of the action takes place in northern Ohio, and he shows his keen eye for detail on the roads and in the towns, as well as the occasional college campus. His grasp of the psychology of the traumatized children as they become complicit in their doom and his portrait of the trafficker’s polished turpitude are chilling. 

A thriller written by an academic is not unheard of thing. Yale Law professor Stephen L. Carter’s 2002 novel The Emperor of Ocean Park was a best seller and launched his “Elm Harbor” series, including New England White and Palace Council. It turns out that commanding precise legal knowledge can help propel a thriller.

Whether a taught thriller can rescue a defrocked academic, however, is another thing. Sometimes the bad guys win.

The book is available for purchase on Amazon.

Follow the National Association of Scholars on X.

  1. This was such a fascinating and thought-provoking piece. I really appreciated how it explored the connection between academic freedom, public controversy, and creative expression through thriller writing. The article doesn’t just discuss a book—it reflects on how personal experiences, professional conflict, and legal insight can shape powerful storytelling. The idea of turning difficult real-life experiences into a suspenseful narrative is especially compelling, and it adds an extra layer of depth to the thriller itself. A very engaging read that blends literature, academia, and social commentary in a unique way.

  2. Thank you for publishing this review…

  3. This is a fascinating and timely look at the intersection of academic freedom, ‘cancel culture,’ and the creative process. I especially appreciate the insight that fiction can sometimes provide a freer space to explore controversial or uncomfortable truths than traditional academic discourse. The way the article frames the act of writing a thriller as a form of intellectual survival and a reclamation of voice is both compelling and thought-provoking. Thank you for sharing such a nuanced and provocative reflection on the changing landscape of higher education and the enduring power of the narrative!

  4. Sometimes the bad guys win a Phyrric victory.

    Standard gauge railroad tracks are 4 feet, 8.5 inches apart. Maine narrow gauge railroad tracks were only 2 feet apart. The advantage of the latter was twofold, being smaller, such a railroad was much cheaper to build, equip, and operate. As it needed a narrower right away and could curve easier, it also was ideal for following rivers up into the mountains.

    The Maine Central Railroad was a standard gauge railroad that by 1940 had run all of the narrow gauges out of business by refusing to let them to cross its tracks. They couldn’t cross at grade, they couldn’t go under, and they couldn’t go over — hence the narrow gauge railroads could not serve the market of people wanting to transport persons and goods between small ports such as Wiscassett and western Maine.

    That led to the development of roads, with the Maine Central ending passenger service in 1962, and being taken over 20 years later. The bad guys won their battle with the narrow gauge railroads only to lose a bigger one to motor vehicles.

    I think the same thing is starting to happen to higher education. I don’t think the legislative interest that led to those civic centers is going to evaporate, I actually think we’re on the verge of another great awakening, and the public is gonna eventually realize just how much money is spending on a higher education and how little it is actually getting from it.

    I don’t think we’ll see pitchforks and torches, but only because we don’t have pitchforks anymore, and the fire codes, frown on open flames. But I doubt the current tyranny will remain much longer.

  5. Thanks to Peter Wood for this splendid review — and also for reminding people about the utter villainy of the administrators at Ohio Northern University. If there is any justice in the world, Gerber’s book will be a great success and the ONU scoundrels will see their careers go down in flames.

    1. It’s not that ONU scoundrels will have their careers go down in flames as much as ONU itself goes down in flames.

      That’s the point I was trying to make above — by refusing to permit minor markets to have railroad service with their tiny trains, the Maine Central Railroad forced the development of the highways, trucking firms, and winter road maintenance (snow plowing) of an alternative, which then destroyed it.

      There really is nothing preventing Professor Gerber from teaching law independent of a university — not in 2026. He could put lectures on YouTube, he could use zoom or some of their interactive platform, he could even rent the local VFW hall and teach in person.

      The only thing that’s really stopping him are government regulations. Students would take his class because they want to become lawyers, to obtain a state issued license to be a lawyer, and the current ABA Monopoly would prevent his graduates from being able to take state bar exams.

      Otherwise, he and a few other law professors could establish Acme Law School and not only offer a better legal education than most law schools offer, but at considerably less cost. And perhaps we would have graduates actually passing the bar exam on the basis what they learned in law school, and not having to take my prep courses to learn the things they were never taught…

      The thing that a lot of people do not realize is the extent to which the whole calliope would come crashing to the ground if the government issued monopolies where ever rescinded. Let’s start with undergraduate education and the 50 year-old Supreme Court decision that ruled that aptitude exams were discriminatory, but that requiring a college degree was not.

      That’s why we have all these jobs that never used to require a college degree but we now do. And as state governments are exempt from much of the EEOC, it’s why we now see state governments dropping requirements for a college degree.

      If the 1964 civil rights act was rewritten to eliminate disparate impact, which it was never intended to include, a lot of the jobs that currently require college agrees no longer would, and a lot of undergraduates would no longer be undergraduates.

      And then we take the professional degrees: law, medicine, engineering, accounting, nursing, K-12 teaching, etc. None of these used to require graduation from an accredited program — not even medicine. In fact, if you read the actual book that developed into the.MASH TV show, the character that became Frank Burns was based on a real MD who had acquired his license by interning with his father instead of going to medical school.

      The public is not happy with academia, it’s not happy with the price, it’s not happy with the politicalization, it is particularly not happy with the quality of the education. The college administrators of today remind me of what I’m told about the railroad executives of 60 years ago, equally out of touch with their customers needs and desires.

      And much as Donald Trump made his name and his money developing abandoned rail yards in New York City, I think future developers will make their names and money developing the abandoned college campi which will be littering the country the way abandoned rail yards were in the 1970s.

      I think the American people are on the verge of saying “no mas.“

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *