Raise a Bridge

On February 26, 1775…

Note: The newest installment of The Road to the American Revolution is now live on Substack. Follow the series on FacebookInstagram, and X to keep up with new essays and join the conversation. An excerpt from the article appears below.


On February 26, 1775, the American Revolution nearly began in Salem, Massachusetts.

Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Leslie led more than 250 soldiers of the British 64th Regiment onto transport vessels in Boston Harbor, acting on orders from General Thomas Gage. Loyalist informants had tipped Gage to artillery that colonial militias were secretly stockpiling near the North River in Salem, and he sent Leslie to find it—sailing from Castle Island to Marblehead, then marching inland to seize it. The mission was timed for a Sunday, when the British expected the townspeople to be at church and the roads to be clear. Leslie anticipated no resistance.

He anticipated wrong.

Locals in Marblehead spotted the redcoats disembarking almost immediately, and word spread fast. Messengers rode for Salem as the column of soldiers fixed bayonets and began their march inland. Later accounts would credit Major John Pedrick with racing ahead on horseback to the North Church to sound the alarm. But that story is likely apocryphal. Writer J. L. Bell has noted that the tale first appeared in print more than a century after the event, traced only to family reminiscence, and contemporary records do not place Pedrick at the center of the confrontation. In fact, he says that some evidence suggests he was aligned with the royal government at the time.

What is certain is that Salem was warned. Bells rang. Drums sounded. Minutemen assembled. By the time Leslie and his men reached the North River—the only practical crossing into town—the drawbridge had been raised. The river itself was impassable without it. Militiamen stood on the far bank while townsmen moved the artillery out of reach.

What followed was a standoff neither side seemed eager to settle by force. Leslie’s soldiers waited on the riverbank as daylight faded and the air turned cold. The townsmen, for their part, had no interest in firing the first shot. Instead, they offered Leslie a way to “save face.” The bridge would be lowered. The regiment could cross and march a short, symbolic distance into town. Then Leslie and his men would withdraw.

Leslie agreed. His men crossed, advanced only far enough to satisfy their orders, found nothing, and turned back. They returned to Marblehead and sailed to Boston. No shots were fired…

Read the full article here and follow Jared Gould on X.

  1. As I understand it, the bridge on the Kings Highway that crossed the south river had been destroyed (“pulled up”), and the barges along the north river sunk.

    The issue with the drawbridge is that it was private property and then connected to a town road and not a Kings Highway. Leslie had no right to trespass on private property, and hence no right to order the bridge be lowered so his troops could cross it.

    The difference between here and Lexington is that no one discharged a weapon. We don’t know who fired first in Lexington, and my personal suspicion is that it was a third-party.

    I also suspect that there may have been more loyalist sympathy in Salem/Marble head than in Lexington/Concord because loyalist sympathies were strongest in areas where navigational trade was predominant.

    Yes, people like Hancock smuggled, but there are a lot of other people who sold stuff to the British, who paid hard money, i.e. gold. The British burned an awful lot of firewood in their fireplaces, which is how they attempted to keep their buildings warm, and it all arrived by sea. While it came from as far away as Maine, it was cut anywhere along the coast.

    The British also bought hay — Boston Haymarket Square exists to this day — along with food and other necessities. They didn’t/couldn’t import this from England, they bought it all locally. And they bought it from people who transported it by ship, i.e. people living in places with ships.

    Both Salem (a county seat) and Marblehead were significant ports in the 18th century. While Salem managed to reinvent itself somewhat as a whaling port, Marble head and the rest of the ports in Essex County never recovered from Jefferson‘s embargo. Marblehead today is a resort town for the wealthy, but it was prosperous it own right as a seaport in the 18th century.

    Records are sketchy for a variety of reasons, but places that were involved in nautical trade tended to remain loyal to the crown while the landlocked farm towns tend to be less loyal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *