Institutions long defined by their two-year mission are now conferring four-year degrees in nearly half the country. At the beginning of this month, Inside Higher Ed reported that more than 200 community colleges in 24 states now offer at least 767 bachelor’s programs, with states such as Iowa, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, Nebraska, and California considering expansion. The article described an emerging turf battle: universities warning of duplication and encroachment, community college leaders arguing that they are meeting workforce needs and serving students who are place-bound or priced out of traditional campuses.

However, the current controversy revives a question that has shadowed the two-year college since its inception.

What we now call community colleges is an American invention, with precedents dating back to the 1850s, when four-year universities began experimenting with separating the first two years of college into a separate institution. The idea gained momentum around 1900 under William Rainey Harper, president of the University of Chicago (UChicago), who advocated junior colleges as an alternative for students who would not pursue a full four-year degree. Soon, two-year “junior colleges” appeared in many states, generally offering curricula designed to prepare students for entry into the workforce.

From the outset, there were debates about how these institutions should fit within the broader hierarchy of American higher education. Similar ideas had circulated among other educators, and questions persisted as to whether junior colleges were primarily preparatory extensions of secondary schools, transfer platforms for aspiring university students, or distinct institutions devoted to practical training. Even their structure was unsettled. In 1936, one of Harper’s successors at UChicago, Robert Maynard Hutchins, proposed reorganizing the system by combining the final two years of high school with junior-college study to create a streamlined pathway that could extend into bachelor’s-level preparation, particularly for teacher training.

By 1940, the movement’s expansion had become substantial enough to attract national notice. In the New York Times, education editor Benjamin Fine reported on what he called the “junior college movement,” quoting Dr. Walter C. Eells, secretary of the American Association of Junior Colleges. Eells predicted that enrollment could rise dramatically—perhaps reaching one million students rather than the roughly 200,000 then enrolled in about 575 institutions—if facilities expanded to meet demand. Eells linked that projected growth to the needs of an increasingly mechanized economy that required education beyond high school but not necessarily a traditional four-year degree.

His prediction may have fallen on deaf ears in 1940, but the postwar decades vindicated it decisively. By 1960, two-year college enrollment had more than doubled; by 1970, it had surpassed two million; and by the late 1980s, nearly five million students attended roughly 1,500 institutions, by then widely known as community colleges. What began as an experiment in institutional design became a permanent and expansive sector of American higher education.

Given that history of adaptation, it is difficult to identify a principled basis for insisting that community colleges remain permanently confined to two-year credentials.

The opposition from four-year institutions is nonetheless understandable. Colleges dependent on tuition revenue have reason to worry when lower-cost competitors enter the bachelor’s market. And, well, they should. 

Many four-year institutions now charge tuition far above community-college rates while setting academic expectations at levels once considered remedial. In Iowa, for example, which is “mulling” over a proposal to allow community colleges to issue bachelor’s degrees, annual tuition at community colleges averages only a fraction of that charged by private four-year institutions.

As Preston Cooper at the American Enterprise Institute recently noted in his analysis of the Iowa proposal, lower-cost bachelor’s pathways may matter most in fields where earnings are modest but socially necessary. The number of bachelor’s degrees in education, for example, has declined sharply over the past decade as students have gravitated toward higher-return majors. An education degree is often difficult to justify at traditional four-year tuition levels. At community-college prices, however, the calculation changes. Expanding affordable bachelor’s options in teacher preparation could, Cooper argues, draw students back into a field that many states claim is facing shortages.

The point is not that community colleges will replace universities, but that they may apply a lower-cost model to credentials that now command far higher prices, reshaping incentives in the process. If these new bachelor’s programs insist on competence in reading, writing, speaking, and mathematics and resist the temptation to dilute standards, they could compel four-year institutions to compete on academic seriousness rather than amenities or branding.

The real question, then, is not whether community colleges may grant bachelor’s degrees, but whether they will uphold genuine rigor—and whether their presence will force the broader system to confront its drift.

Competition may reduce prices. Properly directed, it may also restore standards.

Follow the National Association of Scholars and Jared Gould on X.