After openly criticizing “anti-vaxxers” who did not buy into the whole COVID-19 vaccine hoopla, one of my professors at Emory University jokingly posed this question to the lecture hall: “Everyone here is a liberal, right?”
As a freshman who had claimed a philosophical exemption just to attend my university, I cringed. Even though I was still a political floater then, I was turned off by the Biden administration’s aggressive push for vaccination—among his other draconian policies. From that moment on, I quickly learned that leftism was what was acceptable. Conservatism was not.
[RELATED: More Diversity, Lower Standards]
It didn’t take long for me to realize that college wasn’t a place for open inquiry—it was an indoctrination camp. Rather than exposing me to a range of ideas, it immersed me in a “woke” ideology, with “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) woven into nearly every aspect of campus life.
Ostensibly, DEI claims to promote representation and inclusion for the underrepresented. But in practice, it excludes any ideology that doesn’t align with leftist ideals—an irony, given that conservatives are undoubtedly a minority on campus. Instead of fostering intellectual diversity, DEI encourages students to fixate on their differences, particularly race and gender—drifting further from the ideals of color and sex blindness. It also tends to reward minorities simply for being minorities.
Because of this, I face a double whammy.
First, as a black and Latina woman, people assume I must be a staunch leftist. When I tell them I’m not, I’m met with puzzled looks and subtle challenges to my racial loyalty. The left seems baffled by the idea that my race and ethnicity don’t dictate my worldview. But I think for myself—and I’ve found that I align with conservative principles: limited government, traditional values, and the importance of a strong family. If intellectual diversity still mattered on campus, many others might realize they share these values, too.
Second, because honest observers recognize that DEI often elevates identity over merit, I know my achievements will be questioned. My education and professional success resulted from dedication, perseverance, and hard work—my skin color had nothing to do with it. Yet DEI policies, which reward people based on race, cast doubt on that success. Others may assume I’m where I am not because of my effort but because I was given a leg up to fulfill some DEI quota—diminishing the true value of what I’ve earned. As Cato Institute Research Fellow and President of Free Black Thought, Erec Smith told me, “a minority’s merits are always in question. More than one person has suggested that I, myself, am a diversity hire, even though my credentials and politics align with my institute’s mission.”
DEI policies not only prioritize identity over merit; they also reinforce stereotypes—especially for students like me. I face the constant assumption that my political views must align with the left. This reduces me to a mere representative of my ethnicity, ignoring the individuality of my thoughts and beliefs. It implies that I must subscribe to leftist ideologies when, in reality, I have my own values.
[RELATED: Diversity Is a Trojan Horse]
Ending DEI would be a welcome change. These policies diminished my college experience by, rather than promoting true diversity of thought, merely perpetuating the myth that minorities can’t succeed without a leg up. DEI fails to recognize the hard work, dedication, and merit that contribute to my success, and instead, it assumes that I must have received preferential treatment to fulfill a quota.
I hope that with Trump’s attempt to eliminate DEI, diversity of thought will return to college campuses sooner rather than later.
Image: Candler Library, Emory University by Mpspqr on Wikipedia
In English, a Capitol letter indicates a proper noun, i.e. it’s the Democratic party, which is anything but democratic.
If you use the word “liberal” to mean what I think you intend it to mean, you need to Capitalize it because they are anything but liberal. A true liberal believes in John Locke’s concept that each individual has a God-given right to the individual’s “life, liberty, and property” which only God can take away. As the word “property” had two meanings in 1776, much as “man” has two meanings today, Jefferson instead used “pursuit of happiness” in the Declaration of Independence.
If one is pro-life, one is inherently (small “l”) liberal because one is defending the baby’s right to life. So too if one supports small government, individual liberties, and traditional values..
The cadre currently running academia are many things, but liberal is not one of them — they are way too fascist to ever be considered liberal….
I changed liberal to leftist.
Amazing article! Refreshing to see a young person developing their own view and lifepath instead of “going along to get along”… Bravo!
“Person” is singular, so you can not use a plural pronoun!
In English, if the subject is singular, the available pronouns are “he”, “she”, and “it.” This comes from the Latin where everything is either masculine, feminine, or neuter. Some languages (e.g. Spanish) lack the neuter case with things such as trains being male (el tren) and houses being female (la casa).
If you really don’t want to use the “she/her”, it is possible to write the sentence so as to not use it, e.g. “… a young person developing the young person’s own view…”
“Their” is fine in this context. It sounds like a “you” problem, Eddie.
““Their” is fine in this context.”
Only if you are schizophrenic because “their” indicates “more than one” which “person” clearly is not. (Unless the person is schizophrenic…)
The rules of grammar are like the Dig Safe rules — an objective content-neutral system of organization so that everyone can understand each other.
Dig Safe colors are simple — Red is electrical wires, Orange is communication wires (copper or glass), Yellow is gas, Green is drain (storm or sewer), Blue is potable water — you may have seen these colors on streets or sidewalks.
If you use random colors you are likely go get someone killed, electrical lines can be 13,600 volts (or more) and punctured gas lines have been known to take buildings off the face of the earth. Everyone is trusting everyone else to use the right colors. So too with grammar — everyone is trusting everyone else to follow the conventions of the language so as to ensure understanding.
When you use a plural pronoun to refer to a single subject, I have to presume that the subject *isn’t* single and hence that I have missed something.