PSU’s Confucius Institute 2.0: The Portland Institute, NJUPT

PSU’s Confucius Institute 2.0: The Portland Institute, NJUPT

March 24, 2023

Portland State University (PSU) closed its Confucius Institute (CI) in January 2021, citing “a range of financial, staffing and operational reasons.” Thus it shuttered its China-backed language program of 13 years. In its announcement of the closure, PSU noted that it intended to “expand direct academic ties” with China. PSU has made good on its intent, and opened the Portland Institute, NJUPT in cooperation with China’s Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (NJUPT).

Recently anathematized in the US and other countries, CIs are a Chinese effort to project soft power and influence abroad. On the surface, CIs are little more than Chinese language instruction at American colleges, universities, and K–12 school districts funded by Beijing. However, China itself admitted that CIs are more than language programs. In 2009, the then-head of propaganda for the Chinese Communist Party called CIs “an important part of China’s overseas propaganda set-up.” Image management is one thing, but CIs are more than that. They are part of China’s system of espionage and they play a significant role in the loss of American intellectual property and technology.

Universities constantly achieve scientific and technological breakthroughs of dual-use importance for both the economy and the military. Universities often lack the security and safeguards that government agencies and private companies enjoy. American colleges’ combination of innovation and openness makes them a juicy target for foreign adversaries looking to acquire technological advancement.

At the Federal level, national security officials of both Democratic and Republican administrations have acknowledged the threat posed by CIs to America’s standing. In 2018 and 2019, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) began doing the rounds at multiple US colleges, warning them about the risks of Chinese students and researchers in programs that involve “defense applications.” FBI Director Christopher Wray noted that China could access science and technology by “establishing programs in US universities.” Under the Trump administration, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo accused US colleges of jeopardizing American science and technology by taking Chinese funding and collaborating with China.

That Portland State University closed its CI, only to replace it with a collaborative effort in science and technology, raises a number of concerns. PSU, like many American colleges, closed its CI but retained or forged new ties with China. On January 28, 2021, PSU publicly announced the closure of its CI—however, the day prior to the announcement, PSU President Stephen Percy wrote to the president of the Chinese International Education Foundation to reassert the university’s ties to China. Percy expressed his desire to “deepen” the partnership between PSU and its Chinese partner, Soochow University.

Two weeks after this announcement, Senator Marco Rubio’s office wrote to President Percy warning of how China integrates its universities and its military. Rubio noted Soochow University’s role in helping China develop “classified defense research and training” and its work with Changfeng Science and Technology Industry Group. Changfeng is involved with missile manufacturing. Soochow University has “one of the highest concentrations of defense-related programs for any Chinese university.” Given PSU’s express desire to maintain ties with Soochow University, its partnership with another technology-focused Chinese institution raises serious questions.

On April 28, 2021, PSU President Percy and Vice President Susan Jeffords attended a joint virtual signing with NJUPT to inaugurate the opening of a “cooperatively-run school” centered on science and technology. Notably, the relevant academic department heads of the College of Engineering and Computer Science (PSU), the College of Electronic and Optical Engineering (NJUPT), and the College of Telecommunications and Information Engineering (NJUPT) were also present. In 2023, PSU’s Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering celebrated its first year of collaboration with NJUPT. The problem is, NJUPT is one of the top defense-related universities in China.

In 2020, the United States instituted a ban on “Chinese graduate students with military ties,” and specifically focused on a list of Chinese schools that included NJUPT. According to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), NJUPT is one of China’s top universities connected to Beijing’s defense sector. ASPI notes that 16% of NJUPT’s graduates from 2018 entered the Chinese defense sector, and that the college works with China’s People’s Liberation Army on projects related to signals intelligence and cyberwarfare. Research conducted by Goergetown University on the threat that Chinese universities pose to American technology and academia corroborated ASPI’s findings, noting that NJUPT is among a number of Chinese institutions devoted to helping Beijing acquire technology for “military-civil fusion.”

After being warned about ties to Chinese universities with national security risks, why did PSU quickly forge a new partnership with a well-connected Chinese institution linked to Beijing’s military? PSU’s determination to partner with Chinese universities connected to Beijing’s defense sector expands beyond the corrosive effects of its now-closed CI and the soft power it promoted. PSU is now actively building ties with China’s military.

Image: Visitor7, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license

Discussion

Kunga Shidhe-Chokra

January 29, 2025

Hi, I recently made a video about PSU and their relationship to the CCP’s military based off of this article on the instagram account sftpnw. Do you have any more information about this or useful sources that’ll be helpful towards more research that’ll hopefully guide my group’s goal of knowing whether PSU is purposefully funding and researching to help China’s military technology. I would really appreciate your help as this would be a big campaign for my grassroots organization, Students for Free Tibet.

Reply
Miles

May 7, 2023

I am a current student at PSU, and this article does not have up to date information. Yes there was a long standing partnership with Soochow, but for the 2 years that I’ve been here, those ties don’t seem to be active. I am a student double majoring in Music Performance and Asian Studies. Up until recently I was planning on a degree in Chinese language instead of Asian Studies, but as of this year the entire program has been dropped, with the exception of entry level courses. There is now only one study abroad option through PSU left for Chinese immersion, which is in Taiwan.
I am not on here to debate, but to give the facts as they are now, and the perspective as a arts and language student. None of my colleagues are learning the language for political reasons. We do it because it teases our minds learning the language, and fascinates us, the complexity that is culture and society.
We are simply saddened that recently, politics has started to drive a wall between our academic goals.

Reply
1. Bradley
  
  August 7, 2023
  
  LMAO. Someone from the studies side of the university. Of course you wouldn’t be targeted. Nothing useful in those departments for theft. Over the years, I heard certain things internally through the department that corroborate this article (including at least one professor that may be directly compromised by the thousand talents program). I can also definitively state that those “exchange students” were allowed to cheat their way through exams, so the damage done was likely minimal, if nothing else.
  
  PSU Grad: MCECS.
  
  Reply
Phil

April 26, 2023

Most public universities in the U.S. that are peers of Portland State University (PSU) house an on-campus ROTC program that is directly linked to the U.S. military. Does the mere presence of an ROTC program on a US campus make that university somehow nefariously militaristic and dangerous? Should foreign universities in countries whose government has had some friction with the U.S. government avoid any international academic exchange programs with US universities that host ROTC programs? If that is an accurate statistic about 16% of China’s NJUPT graduates going on to work in China’s defense sector, that means that 84% or the vast majority of NJUPT graduates go on to work in one of China’s non-defense sectors. I think we would learn a lot more facts about the PSU academic exchanges from experts like deans and professors of engineering at PSU than from a grandstanding US politician with no such expertise like Marco Rubio.

Reply
Jonathan

March 24, 2023

I would think that if the U.S. government thinks this is a national security threat, it should control or prevent it. Otherwise, it seems like pretty ordinary ties between universities. Why shouldn’t Portland State pursue this? U.S. trade with China is now almost $700 billion/year! Much of it technology related. I don’t see how this relationship with a not-upper-tier university poses much of a threat. Perhaps the U.S. is using Portland State to spy on China?

Reply
Patti

March 24, 2023

I would guess that most people, outside of Oregon and southern Washington state, have never heard of Portland State University. It sounds to me like they desperately want to increase their name recognition nationwide and this is the way to do it. I also suspect money was a really big (major?) factor in this. It’s depressing that money trumps everything—even things that undermine our national interests.

Reply
1. Dr. Ed
  
  March 25, 2023
  
  Reality is that half of the existing colleges & universities are predicted to close or merge by the end of the decade, and that state schools aren’t exempt as state legislatures look at the pressure of medicare and other expenses of an aging population. Money *does* matter, and increasingly will matter.
  
  That said, don’t presume that our national interests are supported in academia — it’s not just about the money and there are a lot of people in academia who really don’t like this country that much, and who definitely don’t see China as a threat.
  
  The House UnAmerican Activities Committee went way too far, and Joe McCarthy was a drunk even by the wet standards of that era, and I don’t want to go back to the loyalty oaths which lasted well into the 1960s — but we *do* need to do something about the anti-Americanism in Academia, or at least stop paying for it.
  
  Reply